قابل توجه نویسندگان محترم، مقالاتی که از تاریخ 1404/07/13 برای نشریه ارسال می شوند، شامل پرداخت هزینه بررسی نخواهند شد.
Volume 10, Issue 2 (Semi-Annual 2025)
CIAUJ 2025, 10(2): 1-26 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi S, Abbasnezhad Sarab M. (2025). An Investigation of the Experience-based tourism approach in the adaptability and reuse of industrial heritage; Case Study: Nakhrisi Factory of Mashhad. CIAUJ. 10(2), 1-26. doi:10.61882/ciauj.10.2.590
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-590-en.html
URL: http://ciauj-tabriziau.ir/article-1-590-en.html
1- School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran , sarafadaei@ut.ac.ir
2- School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran
2- School of Architecture, College of Fine Arts, University of Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1967 Views)
In recent years, the conservation and reuse of industrial heritage in many cities around the world have been recognized as an crucial approach to sustainable development. Many challenges arise in finding the most appropriate usefor these sites, including high economic costs associated with reuse and the lack of quick return on investment, making this process quite complex. One of the most recent strategies in management and marketing is the concept of the experience economy, which can be applied to the reuse of heritage sites. This approach aims to value and re-empower heritage beyond traditional museum perspective. Industrial sites, due to their valuable historical and aesthetic features, are unique places that can create memorable experiences when used correctly and when special scenes are created. This can lead to sustainable exploitation of the sites. The multi-criteria decision-making method has been utilized to select the most appropriate use in the reuse process of the case study of the Nakhrisi Factory in Mashhad. The results indicate that by employing the multi-criteria decision-making method and designing the selected option according to the principles of the experience economy and Pine and Gilmore's four-realms model, stakeholders' needs can be met. This not only provides a different and memorable experience but also ensures the continued existence of this heritage complex, preserving it for future generations.
Keywords: Industrial Heritage, Adaptive Reuse, Experience Economy, Experience-Based Tourism, Nakhrisi Factory of Mashhad, Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
the comparative studies of Architecture and Urbanism in the realm of Cultural Iran
Received: 2024/10/25 | Accepted: 2025/08/6 | ePublished: 2025/12/30
Received: 2024/10/25 | Accepted: 2025/08/6 | ePublished: 2025/12/30
References
1. Azari Khakaster, Gholamreza, Khanizadeh, Mehdi. (2012). Documents of the sale of electricity from Mashhad to the Red Army and the Russian government's refusal to pay taxes, Payam Baharestan Journal, 5(19), 373[in Persian].
2. Aydeniz, N. E. K., & Taddonio, S.(2015) "Adaptive reuse of industrial heritage for the experience economy purpose in historical city center of ayvalik "; preservation of an old olive oil factory as gastronomy center.
3. Boswijk, A., Thijssen, T., & Peelen, E. (2007). The experience economy: A new perspective. Pearson Education.
4. Balta, M. Ö. (2022). An AHP-based multi-criteria model for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Geographies, Planning and Tourism Studios, 2(1), 40-45. [DOI:10.5505/gpts.2022.36854]
5. Chen, H., & Rahman, I. (2018). Cultural tourism: An analysis of engagement, cultural contact, memorable tourism experience and destination loyalty. Tourism management perspectives, 26, 153-163. [DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2017.10.006]
6. Custódio Santos, M., Ferreira, A., Costa, C., & Santos, J. A. C. (2020). A model for the development of innovative tourism products: From service to transformation. Sustainability, 12(11), 4362. [DOI:10.3390/su12114362]
7. Cuerva, E., Urbano, J., & Cornadó, C. (2019). Recovering industrial heritage: Restoration of the wine cellar cooperative in Falset (Catalonia, Spain). Buildings, 9(12), 243. [DOI:10.3390/buildings9120243]
8. Claver, J., García-Domínguez, A., & Sebastián, M. A. (2018). Decision‐Making Methodologies for Reuse of Industrial Assets. Complexity, 2018(1), 4070496. [DOI:10.1155/2018/4070496]
9. De Gregorio, S., De Vita, M., De Berardinis, P., Palmero, L., & Risdonne, A. (2020). Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage to enhance the local context. Sustainability, 12(21), 9059. [DOI:10.3390/su12219059]
10. Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. Routledge. [DOI:10.4324/9780080458519]
11. Darmer, P., & Sundbo, J. (2008). Introduction to experience creation. In Creating experiences in the experience economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. [DOI:10.4337/9781848444003.00005]
12. Elsorady, D. A. (2014). Assessment of the compatibility of new uses for heritage buildings: The example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(5), 511-521. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2013.10.011]
13. Foroughi S, Androodi E, Ansari H R. Recognition of Values for Reuse of Industrial Heritage of Tabriz City Case Study: Barq-e-Lame Factory. CIAUJ 2024; 9 (1) :205-228.[in Persian] https://civilica.com/doc/2063680 [DOI:10.61186/ciauj.9.1.265]
14. Gustafsson, C.; Mellar, B. Research for CULT Committee-Best Practices in Sustainable Management and Safeguarding of Cultural Heritage In The EU; European Parliament, Policy Department for Structural and Cohesion Policies: Brussels, Belgium, 2018
15. Hosany, S., & Witham, M. (2010). Dimensions of cruisers' experiences, satisfaction, and intention to recommend. Journal of travel research, 49(3), 351-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047287509346859 [DOI:10.1177/0047287509346859]
16. Haroun, H. A. A. F., Bakr, A. F., & Hasan, A. E. S. (2019). Multi-criteria decision making for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria engineering journal, 58(2), 467-478. [DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2019.04.003]
17. Hatit, Shahnaz, Abtahi, Alireza, Nourai, Morteza, & Hasanabadi, Abolfazl. (2018). The role of Nakhrisi and Khosravi textile factory in Khorasan on the socio-economic situation of Mashhad (1350-1316). Research Journal of Great Khorasan, 10(35), 56-37. [in Persian] https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.22516131.1398.9.35.3.0
18. Johansson, M., & Kociatkiewicz, J. (2011). City festivals: creativity and control in staged urban experiences. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), 392-405. [DOI:10.1177/0969776411407810]
19. Jelinčić, D. A., & Senkić, M. (2017). Creating a heritage tourism experience. The power of the senses. Etnološka tribina, (40). [DOI:10.15378/1848-9540.2017.40.03]
20. Knobloch, U., Robertson, K., & Aitken, R. (2017). Experience, emotion, and eudaimonia: A consideration of tourist experiences and well-being. Journal of Travel Research, 56(5), 651-662. [DOI:10.1177/0047287516650937]
21. Li, Y., Zhao, L., Huang, J., & Law, A. (2021). Research frameworks, methodologies, and assessment methods concerning the adaptive reuse of architectural heritage: A review. Built Heritage, 5, 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x [DOI:10.1186/s43238-021-00025-x]
22. Morano, P., Locurcio, M., & Tajani, F. (2016). Cultural heritage valorization: an application of AHP for the choice of the highest and best use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 952-959. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.328]
23. Mahdovinejad, Mohammad Javad, Dehban, Mohammad, and Bezazzadeh, Hassan. (2014). Contemporary architectural heritage and industrial identity in historical boundaries (case example: Dezful city). Iranian Islamic City Studies, 6(22), 41-50. [in Persian]
24. Nadkarni, R. R., & Puthuvayi, B. (2020). A comprehensive literature review of Multi-Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, 101814. [DOI:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101814]
25. Nesticò, A., & Somma, P. (2019). Comparative analysis of multi-criteria methods for the enhancement of historical buildings. Sustainability, 11(17), 4526. [DOI:10.3390/su11174526]
26. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (2011). The experience economy. Harvard Business Press.
https://doi.org/10.5860/CHOICE.49-3962 [DOI:10.5860/Choice.49-3962]
27. Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1998). Welcome to the experience economy (Vol. 76, No. 4, pp. 97-105). Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard Business Review Press
28. Pine, B. J. (1999). II, and James H. Gilmore. The Experience Economy: Work ls Theatre and Every Business a Stage, Harvard Busness School Press, Boston.
29. Pujiastuti, E. E., Soeprapto, A., Susanta, S., Utomo, H. S., & Maharaniputri, A. (2022). The role of perceived value in understanding tourist experience and post experience at heritage destinations. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, 36-56. [DOI:10.20885/jsb.vol26.iss1.art3]
30. Ragheb, G. A. (2021). Multi-Criteria Decision Making of Sustainable Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings Based on the A'WOT Analysis: A Case Study of Cordahi Complex, Alexandria, Egypt. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning. http://dx.doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160309 [DOI:10.18280/ijsdp.160309]
31. Rudan, E. (2023). Circular Economy of Cultural Heritage-Possibility to Create a New Tourism Product through Adaptive Reuse. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3), 196. [DOI:10.3390/jrfm16030196]
32. Ribera, F., Nesticò, A., Cucco, P., & Maselli, G. (2020). A multicriteria approach to identify the Highest and Best Use for historical buildings. Journal of cultural heritage, 41, 166-177. [DOI:10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.004]
33. Sotiriadis, M. (2017). Experiential dimensions and their influence on behavioral intentions within the context of nature-based tourism. Tourism and hospitality management, 23(1), 35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.20867/thm.23.1.7 [DOI:10.20867/thm.23.1.7]
34. Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia, 3(1), 77-87. [DOI:10.3390/encyclopedia3010006]
35. Tootoonchi, R., Moradi, S., & Fadaei Nezhad Bahramjerdi, S. (2022). Multi-criteria Decision Making for Adaptive Reuse of Nima Yooshij's house in Tehran. Culture of Islamic Architecture and Urbanism Journal, 7(1), 153-171. [in Persian] https://www.doi.org/10.52547/ciauj.7.1.153 [DOI:10.52547/ciauj.7.1.153]
36. Vardopoulos, I. (2023). Adaptive Reuse for Sustainable Development and Land Use: A Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Estimating Key Determinants of Public Perceptions. Heritage, 6(2), 809-828. [DOI:10.3390/heritage6020045]
37. Vehbi, B. O., Günçe, K., & Iranmanesh, A. (2021). Multi-criteria assessment for defining compatible new use: Old administrative hospital, Kyrenia, Cyprus. Sustainability, 13(4), 1922. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041922 [DOI:10.3390/su13041922]
38. Vafaie, F., Remøy, H., & Gruis, V. (2023). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings; a systematic literature review of success factors. Habitat International, 142, 102926. [DOI:10.1016/j.habitatint.2023.102926]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
